Eating or investing is not enough - a balanced diet for your body and a sensible investment plan for your finances, designed to fit your specific needs, is what you should aim for!
The data is encouraging. Systematic Investment Plans and investments by individuals in mutual funds continues despite:
Given these many variables, the continued flow of SIP into equity mutual fuinds is, indeed, a big win and - in my opinion - investors like you are doing the right thing by continuing to invest in a steady, planned manner via the easy-to-use SIP. But the key question is: are you investing in a correct mix of underlying mutual funds?
Are you drifting - or in control?
Many of us drift and flow with the tide. We are told by our family, our neighbours, and our friendly contact in our bank to 'invest in mutual funds'. That is good advice. As the AMFI saying goes "mutual fund sahi hai".
The AMFI message is spot on: For most investors, mutual funds are the best medium with which to create long- term wealth. Investing your savings in mutual funds to allow your money to work for you while you may still be working (or a lucky few are settled in retirement) is a time-tested winning idea. But it is incomplete advice. It is a bit like being told by the ever-watchful mother or aunt, "beta, tum patley ho gaye - tumko jyaada khaana lena khana chahiye". Yes, eating more food is probably a good idea for many given our stressful and busy lives but there is "bad" food and "good" food. Similarly, the act of investing is good, but you should know how to invest and where to invest.
There are over 90 million folios invested in equity mutual funds. Though the number of unique investors may be smaller, is it possible that tens of millions of investors have been given a wrong diet of mutual funds and they are investing in mutual funds that may not suit their purpose?
The background to this doubt lies in a fundamental fact: intermediaries earn more commission on selling you a Regular Plan of an equity mutual fund than a gold fund or a liquid fund. Commissions to intermediaries on equity mutual funds tend to be 1% of the money they make you invest - this is 10x the commission paid to the intermediaries were you to invest that same amount of money in a liquid funds. Similarly, within equity mutual funds there are two broad categories: those that are
The "actively" managed funds charge higher expense ratios to investors and, therefore, can pay more commissions to intermediaries who help them gather investments from investors like you. The expense ratios of the passive funds tend to be 1/5th of the active funds and, hence, they pay a lower commission to intermediaries for the investments they bring in.
It is important to know that a monetary reward to an intermediary is not the same for every product or mutual fund placed in front of you; and, hence, every investor must ensure that what you they need, . the The basket of mutual funds you need, is what you eventually invest in.
There are times when the label of the mutual fund is misleading. There have been so many hybrid funds and balanced funds that have been launched, which are anything but balanced! They are equity funds in disguise and give investors a false sense of security. If you have invested in a balanced fund you can see how it behaved during a market collapse: say from Feb 1st 2020 till March 31st 2020 when COVID erupted; or from December 31 2021 till June 2022 when the US central bank, the Fed, decided to start increasing interest rates. Chances are it behaved similar to the stock market index - in which case you should be buying an equity fund where the label better explains the risk-return reward that you are placing your savings into.
Should investing really be that difficult and complicated? Should mis-labelling or commission-incentives be a risk that you have to live with as you build a portfolio of equity, gold and liquid funds to give you a combination of potential for return and safety of capital? The answer is a resounding "No!".
Design your own 'hybrid portfolio' with the unique 12-20-80 solution.
As the founder of Quantum Advisors, the Sponsor of Quantum Mutual Fund, I know we started on a difficult journey that had one mission: offer simple solutions at transparent costs to sensible, long-term investors. Over the years, as the QuantumAMC website states very clearly, "Quantum Mutual Fund has methodically nurtured the building blocks of the 3 basic materials required to build a solid home for your financial savings. With a few clicks, find the correct mix of stability, growth and protection needed for your investment portfolio".
Those 3 basic materials are:
Easy steps to a tailor-made portfolio for your needs.
The ability to decide how you want to break up your monthly SIP or one-time investment in the simple 12-20-80 engine is revolutionary and easy to use. There are 6 questions you are asked - and no hocus pocus mumbo jumbo of evaluating your "risk-level".
There is a suggested portfolio, and you can change it whenever you wish and tailor-make it to suit your changing needs.
So, yes, stay invested with:
but don't forget to ensure that you invest in products that are relevant to you and work for you!
How the 12-20-80 solution allowed me to create my own 'hybrid fund portfolio'
As a disclosure and founder of Quantum Advisors / Quantum Mutual Fund, I follow what I preach. For my portfolio, I have adopted a balanced path of investing in equity mutual funds for long term returns, while ensuring I have built a safety belt to ride out the sudden twists and turns of life. Bad news and shaky markets can come hurtling at you unexpectedly from any direction.
Enjoy the freedom to choose your path forward by using the easy-to-use calculator 12 20 80 (baaraa, bees, aur assi). Remember, its not just the answer to "How many mutual funds should I invest in?" that you need to focus on - but the correct mix of mutual funds based on your needs and your objectives.
Table 1: "Passively" managed and factor-based equity funds cost 60% less than "Actively" managed equity funds: you can decide which path you wish to follow
Asset class allocation illustrations as per QMF 12 20 80 | % Weight in an Actively Managed Portfolio | Expense Ratio | % Weight in a Passively Managed Portfolio | Expense Ratio |
---|---|---|---|---|
Liquid Fund, safe money | 12 months | 0.16% | 12 months | 0.16% |
Gold, after Liquid Fund | 20% | 0.06% | 20% | 0.06% |
Equity, after Liquid Fund | 80% | 0.72% | 80% | 0.27% |
Of which Equity Fund of Fund | 70% | 0.51% | 0% | - |
Of which Value Fund | 15% | 1.29% | 0% | - |
Of which India ESG Fund | 15% | 0.94% | 15% | 0.94% |
Of which Nifty Fund of Funds | 0% | - | 65% | 0.20% |
This table below approximates my holdings and planned investments as of September 2022.
Table 1: "Passively" managed and factor-based equity funds cost 60% less than "Actively" managed equity funds: you can decide which path you wish to follow
Asset Class | QMF Base Suggestion | Ajit | Comment |
---|---|---|---|
Liquid Fund, safe money | 12 months | 12 months | Plan to increase to about 18 months |
Gold, after Liquid Fund | 20% | 24% | |
Equity, after Liquid Fund | 80% | 70% | My 6% in Multi Asset Fund has some equity |
Of which, Equity Fund of Fund | 75% | 27% | Those who are 'style indifferent' should own a higher % of Equity Fund of Fund |
Of which, Value Fund | 15% | 35% | I have a 'Value bias' |
Of which, India ESG Fund | 15% | 32% | I have a 'ESG' bias |
Of which, Q Nifty ETF FoF | 0% | 7% | Tracks NSE 50 Index |
Other: Multi Asset Fund | 0% | 6% | Alternative to an FD |
(Article written by Ajit Dayal and carried by PersonalFN on 14 November 2022)